Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has introduced the "Save the Kurds Act" as escalating violence in northern Syria forces President Trump to confront a critical foreign policy decision just days into his second term. The legislation proposes "crippling sanctions" against any group attacking Kurdish populations who served as America's key allies in destroying the ISIS caliphate.
Graham's timing couldn't be more crucial. As Trump works to implement his America First agenda and end endless foreign wars, the situation in Syria presents a challenging test of how to honor commitments to allies while avoiding deeper military entanglements that drain American resources.
"Turning America's back on the Kurds would be a catastrophic blow to U.S. national security," Graham warned, highlighting the strategic importance of these allies who bled alongside American forces to eliminate the ISIS threat that terrorized the world under Obama's weak leadership.
Kurdish Allies Face Renewed Threats
The Kurdish forces, who served as America's most reliable partners in the fight against ISIS, now face increasing attacks in northern Syria. These brave fighters took on the most dangerous missions while other so-called allies sat on the sidelines, proving their loyalty when it mattered most.
Graham's legislation would impose severe economic sanctions on any entity—whether state or non-state actors—that targets Kurdish populations. This approach aligns with Trump's preference for using economic leverage rather than military intervention to achieve foreign policy objectives.
"We cannot abandon those who stood with us when the stakes were highest," a senior Republican aide told reporters. "The Kurds proved their worth in blood while fighting the most evil terrorist organization of our time."
The timing of Graham's bill puts the spotlight on Trump's foreign policy team, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, as they navigate the complex Syrian situation. Will Trump find a way to protect America's Kurdish allies while staying true to his promise of ending costly foreign interventions?
Patriots know that America's word must mean something on the world stage—but how do we balance that with putting America First?