Politics

CENSORSHIP EXPOSED: LinkedIn Brands Support for ICE Agents as 'HATEFUL' Before Backtracking

Gary FranchiJanuary 31, 2026242 views
CENSORSHIP EXPOSED: LinkedIn Brands Support for ICE Agents as 'HATEFUL' Before Backtracking
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

Another day, another Big Tech censorship scandal – this time targeting Americans who dare to support our immigration enforcement officers. LinkedIn, the professional networking platform, found itself in hot water after temporarily yanking a conservative advocacy group's post that praised ICE agents, labeling it as 'hateful content.'

The post, which expressed support for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents carrying out their constitutional duties, was flagged and removed by LinkedIn's content moderation system. The conservative group immediately cried foul, pointing out the obvious bias in a system that considers supporting law enforcement to be 'hate speech.'

This incident perfectly illustrates the warped worldview of Silicon Valley elites who have spent years demonizing ICE agents – the same brave men and women who risk their lives daily to protect American communities from dangerous criminals and human traffickers.

Pattern of Anti-Law Enforcement Bias

LinkedIn's knee-jerk reaction to remove pro-ICE content reveals the deep-seated hostility toward immigration enforcement that permeates Big Tech companies. While these platforms allow posts celebrating illegal border crossings and attacking border security, apparently expressing gratitude for ICE agents crosses their arbitrary line.

The timing couldn't be more telling. As President Trump's administration ramps up deportation operations and border security measures, tech companies seem determined to suppress any content that might build public support for these essential law enforcement activities.

When did supporting federal law enforcement officers become 'hateful' in America?

After facing immediate backlash, LinkedIn quietly restored the post and claimed it was removed 'by mistake.' But Patriots aren't buying this convenient excuse. How many other pro-law enforcement posts have been silently censored without anyone noticing?

This censorship attempt exposes the broader campaign to delegitimize immigration enforcement and paint ICE agents as villains rather than the heroes they truly are. These officers separate children from human traffickers, arrest dangerous criminals, and protect American workers from unfair competition – yet Big Tech treats support for their mission as hate speech.

How long will conservatives tolerate Silicon Valley's assault on free speech and their attacks on American law enforcement?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (7)

Leave a Comment

C
ConservativeVoice88VerifiedFeb 1, 2026
LinkedIn showing their true colors again. At least they backtracked when called out, but the damage is done - we see how they really feel about law enforcement.
F
FreeSpeechMattersVerifiedFeb 1, 2026
Has anyone else noticed this trend of censoring pro-law enforcement content across all social media platforms? It's getting ridiculous.
T
TruthTeller2023Verified6 days ago
Yes! Facebook did something similar to my police support post last month. Had to appeal it twice.
V
VeteranDadVerified6 days ago
I work in tech and I can tell you this stuff doesn't happen by accident. These platforms are programmed with clear political bias against conservative viewpoints and traditional American values.
A
AmericaFirst_JaneVerified6 days ago
Good for whoever exposed this! We need to keep shining light on these biased algorithms and moderation practices.
P
PatriotMike2024Verified6 days ago
This is exactly why we can't trust Big Tech platforms to remain neutral. Supporting our border patrol agents is now considered 'hateful'? These are the men and women keeping our country safe!
B
BorderSecurityFirstVerified5 days ago
Absolutely right Mike. My brother-in-law is ICE and the stuff he deals with daily would shock most people.