Politics

ESTABLISHMENT BETRAYAL: Thune BACKS DOWN From Filibuster Deal to Pass Election Integrity Bill

Gary FranchiFebruary 3, 2026124 views
ESTABLISHMENT BETRAYAL: Thune BACKS DOWN From Filibuster Deal to Pass Election Integrity Bill
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

Just ten days into the Trump Administration's historic second term, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) is already proving why conservatives were right to be skeptical of his leadership. The establishment Republican is now DENYING he made any commitments to weaken the filibuster to pass the SAVE Act - a critical election integrity bill that would require proof of citizenship to vote.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), a fierce America First warrior, apparently believed she had secured Thune's commitment to discuss filibuster reform with the GOP conference to advance the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act. But when pressed by the Washington Examiner on Tuesday, Thune quickly backpedaled.

"We haven't made any commitments," Thune said, rebuffing Luna's suggestions that he had promised action on the filibuster.

This is exactly the kind of weak-kneed, establishment thinking that has allowed Democrats to steamroll conservative priorities for decades. While President Trump is moving at lightning speed to secure our border and restore American strength, Thune is already making excuses about why Republicans can't deliver on basic election security.

The SAVE Act: Common Sense Under Attack

The SAVE Act isn't some radical proposal - it's basic common sense that only American citizens should vote in American elections. But Democrats are so committed to protecting their illegal voter base that they'll filibuster even the most basic election integrity measures.

Meanwhile, these same Democrats had no problem nuking the filibuster when it suited their agenda during the Obama and Biden years. They eliminated it for judicial nominees and constantly threatened to kill it entirely for their radical spending bills.

Patriots across America are watching to see if Thune will stand with President Trump's mandate for secure elections, or if he'll cave to the swamp creatures who want to maintain the broken status quo. The American people voted for ACTION, not excuses.

Will Thune find his backbone and fight for election integrity, or will he prove that the Senate GOP establishment learned nothing from Trump's overwhelming victory?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (11)

Leave a Comment

S
SmallTownAmericaVerified20 hours ago
I volunteered as a poll watcher last election and saw firsthand how loose some of these procedures are. We NEED federal standards.
G
GrasshootsGOPVerified10 hours ago
The grassroots conservatives who put these people in office are watching. We'll remember this come primary season.
C
ConstitutionFirstVerified9 hours ago
Another RINO strikes again! Primary him out!
E
ElectionWatcherVerifiedjust now
Can someone explain why ending the filibuster for this specific bill would have been controversial? Seems like election integrity should be bipartisan.
D
DCInsiderVerifiedjust now
Because once you break the filibuster for one thing, it opens the door for Dems to do it for everything when they're back in power.
T
TrueConservative88Verifiedjust now
Thune showing his true colors again. We need fighters, not politicians who cave to pressure from the swamp.
R
RedStateRealistVerifiedjust now
Look, I get being frustrated, but maybe Thune knows something we don't about the parliamentary procedure here. Sometimes you have to pick your battles strategically.
F
FightForAmericaVerifiedjust now
That's exactly the kind of thinking that got us into this mess. Time to fight!
P
PatriotMom2024Verifiedjust now
This is EXACTLY why we can't trust the establishment Republicans! They campaign on election integrity then fold the moment they have a chance to actually DO something about it.
C
ConservativeVoterVerifiedjust now
100% agree. All talk, no action when it counts.
V
VoterIDNowVerifiedjust now
How is requiring ID to vote controversial? I need ID to buy groceries, get on a plane, everything else in life.