The Republican National Committee has filed an urgent petition asking the Supreme Court to intervene in a critical Pennsylvania election case, warning that liberal activist judges are systematically undermining election integrity across America.
At stake is Pennsylvania's basic requirement that mail-in ballots be properly dated by voters—a simple safeguard that any reasonable person would consider common sense. But a federal appeals court struck down this law, opening the door for undated and improperly dated ballots to be counted in future elections.
The RNC's petition warns that this ruling continues a "dangerous precedent of courts intervening in election rulemaking" that has plagued our democracy for years. Instead of allowing state legislatures—the people's elected representatives—to set clear rules, unelected federal judges are imposing their own preferences on how elections should be run.
Deep State Judges vs. Election Integrity
This case perfectly illustrates the ongoing battle between Americans who want secure, transparent elections and the establishment forces determined to keep our voting system chaotic and unreliable. Pennsylvania's dating requirement isn't some burdensome obstacle—it's a basic verification step that helps ensure ballots are legitimate and submitted on time.
But to the left-wing judiciary, any requirement that might prevent fraudulent or invalid ballots from being counted is apparently unconstitutional. This is the same mentality that fought voter ID laws, signature verification, and other basic election security measures.
"The appeals court ruling strikes at the heart of state sovereignty over elections and opens the door for more judicial activism in future election disputes," the RNC argued in their filing.
With the RNC set to appear before the Supreme Court next month, this case could determine whether states have the right to implement basic election security measures or whether federal judges will continue micromanaging every aspect of how Americans vote.
Patriots across the country are watching closely. Will the Supreme Court stand with election integrity and state rights, or will they allow activist judges to continue rigging the system? The answer could determine the fate of American democracy itself.