Politics

BREAKING: Talking Filibuster Could SAVE America More Than Just Passing SAVE Act

Gary FranchiFebruary 20, 2026100 views
BREAKING: Talking Filibuster Could SAVE America More Than Just Passing SAVE Act
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

While patriots across America celebrate President Trump's decisive return to power, a growing chorus of conservative voices argues that reforming the Senate filibuster could be more transformative for our republic than even passing critical legislation like the SAVE Act.

The talking filibuster—requiring senators to actually stand and speak continuously to block legislation—would force the radical left to publicly defend their obstruction of Trump's America First agenda in real time, on camera, for all Americans to see.

Think about it, folks: instead of Democrats hiding behind procedural votes and backroom deals, they'd have to stand before the American people and explain why they're blocking border security, energy independence, and the deportation of criminal illegal aliens.

Public Accountability vs. Shadow Games

"The talking filibuster is worth trying," argues a compelling piece from The Federalist. "It is worth a public accounting of whether this Senate, in this moment, for this American people, can deliver on its duties."

Under the current system, Chuck Schumer and his radical allies can obstruct Trump's agenda with a simple procedural vote, then retreat to their DC cocktail parties while mainstream media spins their obstruction as "principled opposition."

But imagine forcing Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Elizabeth Warren to stand for 12 hours straight, explaining to working Americans why they oppose securing our southern border. Picture them trying to justify their globalist priorities while parents struggle to put food on the table.

"This isn't just about procedure—it's about transparency and forcing the swamp creatures into the sunlight where patriots can see exactly who's working for America and who's working against us."

The beauty of this reform? It doesn't eliminate the minority's rights—it simply requires them to work for their obstruction instead of phoning it in from their Georgetown mansions.

Making The Swamp Sweat

President Trump has already shown he's willing to take on sacred cows in Washington. From draining the administrative state through Elon Musk's DOGE initiative to mass deportations, this administration isn't playing by the old rules.

The question every patriot should ask their senators: Are you ready to make the radical left defend their anti-American positions in front of the very people they're betraying? Or will you let them hide in the shadows while America burns?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (10)

Leave a Comment

T
TraditionalistGOPVerifiedjust now
This brings back the original intent of the filibuster - extended debate, not silent obstruction. The Founders would approve of senators having to publicly defend their positions for hours on end.
F
FreedomFighter88Verifiedjust now
100% support this! Let's see how long Chuck Schumer can talk when he has to actually defend his radical agenda on live TV.
P
PatriotMike2024Verifiedjust now
FINALLY someone gets it! The talking filibuster would force senators to actually WORK and explain their positions instead of just sending an email to block legislation.
C
ConstitutionFirstVerifiedjust now
Exactly! Make them stand there for hours defending their obstruction. The American people deserve to see who's really fighting for them.
S
SmallGovAdvocateVerifiedjust now
Can someone explain how this would work with the SAVE Act specifically? Would it force Democrats to publicly oppose election integrity measures?
R
RedStateRealistVerifiedjust now
I remember watching the old Mr. Smith Goes to Washington filibusters on C-SPAN as a kid with my dad. Those senators actually had to make their case and couldn't just hide behind procedural votes. We need that accountability back in the Senate.
O
OldSchoolGOPVerifiedjust now
Those were the days when senators had backbone and principles. Now they just play political games behind closed doors.
C
ConservativeVoter2024Verifiedjust now
The talking filibuster is constitutional, traditional, and would restore actual debate to the Senate. What's not to love?
T
TexasConservativeVerifiedjust now
This is brilliant strategy. Why haven't Republicans been pushing this harder?
A
AmericaFirstMomVerifiedjust now
This could be a game changer! Imagine forcing senators to explain why they oppose common sense reforms while cameras are rolling.