Politics

FEDERAL JUDGE Blocks DOJ From Searching Reporter's SEIZED DEVICES - Deep State Overreach Exposed

Gary FranchiFebruary 25, 2026123 views
FEDERAL JUDGE Blocks DOJ From Searching Reporter's SEIZED DEVICES - Deep State Overreach Exposed
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

A federal judge has delivered a stunning rebuke to the Justice Department's surveillance state tactics, temporarily blocking DOJ officials from rifling through the electronic devices of a Washington Post reporter seized by the FBI last month.

U.S. Magistrate Judge William Porter of Virginia issued the decision late Tuesday, ordering that the court itself will conduct the review of the materials instead of allowing federal agents unfettered access to a journalist's private communications and sources.

This latest incident exposes the concerning pattern of federal agencies targeting members of the press - a practice that continued even under the previous administration's rhetoric about "protecting democracy." The seizure of a reporter's devices represents exactly the kind of Deep State overreach that Patriots have been warning about for years.

Government Surveillance Gone Wild

Think about this, folks: federal agents can simply swoop in and grab a journalist's electronic devices, potentially accessing years of confidential sources, story notes, and private communications. This isn't communist China or Putin's Russia - this is supposed to be America, where the First Amendment still means something.

The fact that a federal judge felt compelled to step in and stop the DOJ from immediately searching these devices suggests there are serious constitutional concerns at play. Judge Porter's decision to have the court review the materials instead shows he recognizes the dangerous precedent of allowing federal agencies to conduct fishing expeditions through journalists' private information.

"The court will conduct its own review of the materials rather than allowing the Justice Department unfettered access to search the devices."

This case highlights why President Trump's criticism of the weaponized federal bureaucracy resonates with so many Americans. When government agencies can seize reporters' devices and potentially expose their sources, we're walking down a very dangerous path toward authoritarian control of information.

The Trump-Vance administration now has an opportunity to reform these overreaching surveillance practices and restore constitutional protections for the press - even when that press is often hostile to conservative viewpoints. True patriots defend the Constitution for everyone, not just their political allies.

How many more reporters' devices have been secretly seized by federal agents? And what does this mean for the sources who risk everything to expose government corruption?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (11)

Leave a Comment

F
FreedomFighter88Verifiedjust now
Finally! Someone standing up to the deep state apparatus.
R
RedStateReporterVerifiedjust now
As someone who works in journalism, this hits close to home. The chilling effect this has on sources coming forward is devastating. Kudos to this judge for protecting press freedom.
C
ConstitutionFirstVerifiedjust now
Which reporter was this about? I want to make sure I'm following their work and supporting real journalism.
P
PatriotMom2024Verifiedjust now
Thank God for judges who still believe in the Constitution! This is exactly the kind of government overreach the Founders warned us about.
C
ConservativeVoterVerifiedjust now
Absolutely right! The DOJ has been weaponized against anyone who dares to report the truth.
A
AmericaFirst2024Verifiedjust now
The DOJ under this administration has completely lost credibility. They go after parents at school board meetings and journalists but let actual criminals walk free.
S
SmallTownVoterVerifiedjust now
Don't forget they also targeted pro-life protesters while ignoring attacks on pregnancy centers.
N
NewsJunkieVerifiedjust now
This judge deserves our thanks for upholding the rule of law when so many others have failed us.
M
MiddleAmericaVoiceVerifiedjust now
My grandfather always said the press was supposed to be a check on government power, not the other way around. This ruling gives me hope that some people still understand that principle.
T
TruthSeeker45Verifiedjust now
This is terrifying - imagine if they can just seize journalists' devices whenever they want. What's next, going after regular citizens who share news on social media?
L
LibertarianDadVerifiedjust now
They're already doing that through social media censorship. This is just the next step.