The Deep State and their media allies are at it again. Just ten days into President Trump's second term, the Wall Street Journal has launched a coordinated attack against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard using the exact same Russia-collusion playbook that failed spectacularly against Trump himself.
According to The Federalist's explosive analysis, the WSJ's supposed 'bombshell' about Gabbard is nothing more than a recycled hoax designed to undermine Trump's intelligence team. Sound familiar? It should – because we've seen this movie before, and it ended with the complete collapse of the Russia collusion narrative.
Social media patriots are already connecting the dots. User @walterbyrd11 highlighted the obvious pattern, noting how "the real story is not the supposed scandal. It is the relentless recycling of the same hoax playbook and the media's grotesque complicity."
Same Playbook, Different Target
The timing couldn't be more transparent. Just as Trump begins dismantling the administrative state with his DOGE initiative and mass deportation plans, suddenly the same intelligence community that weaponized itself against him produces another convenient 'whistleblower' targeting his handpicked DNI.
Journalist Matthew Foldi exposed the manufactured nature of this attack, fact-checking what he called the "bunk" whistleblower report and revealing buried details the WSJ conveniently omitted. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has already pushed back against the false narrative.
Patriots across America see right through this transparent attempt to kneecap Trump's intelligence reforms. User @mharry860 joined the chorus exposing the WSJ's recycled Russia-collusion tactics.
This is exactly why Trump won in a landslide – Americans are sick of the same tired Deep State playbook being used against anyone who threatens the establishment's stranglehold on power. Tulsi Gabbard, a decorated veteran who sacrificed her Democratic Party career to stand with Trump, represents everything the swamp fears most: principled leadership that can't be bought or intimidated.
The question isn't whether this latest hoax will fail – we already know it will. The question is how long will Americans tolerate a media establishment that serves as nothing more than a propaganda arm for the administrative state?