Politics

DELUSIONAL: House Dems Think Clinton Depositions Give Them Shot at Trump Interview

Gary FranchiFebruary 26, 2026225 views
DELUSIONAL: House Dems Think Clinton Depositions Give Them Shot at Trump Interview
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

House Democrats are living in a complete fantasy world if they think Hillary Clinton's recent deposition gives them any leverage to drag President Trump into another congressional circus act.

After Hillary Clinton finally showed up to testify about her cozy relationship with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, House oversight Democrats are now claiming this somehow sets a "precedent" for forcing Trump into a deposition. The sheer audacity would be laughable if it weren't so predictable.

Let's get one thing straight, folks: there's a massive difference between a washed-up former Secretary of State with more scandals than a soap opera and a sitting President of the United States who's actually busy making America great again.

Same Old Democrat Playbook

This is the same tired playbook we've seen for years. Democrats can't win on policy, can't win at the ballot box, so they resort to their favorite pastime: harassment through congressional theater. They spent Trump's entire first term trying to destroy him with bogus investigations, and now they want round two?

The American people delivered a decisive mandate in 2024, giving Republicans control and Trump a clear victory. Instead of accepting the will of the voters, Democrats are already plotting their next attempt to undermine our democratically elected President.

"The precedent is clear," one House Democrat reportedly claimed, apparently forgetting that precedent also shows their investigations tend to backfire spectacularly.

Meanwhile, President Trump is focused on delivering results: securing our border, bringing back American energy dominance, and draining the swamp that these same Democrats helped create.

Patriots See Right Through This

Here's what's really happening: Democrats know they're facing political extinction, and desperate people do desperate things. They're hoping to distract from Trump's massive successes and create new ammunition for their media allies.

But Americans aren't buying it anymore. We've seen this movie before, and we know how it ends – with Democrats looking foolish and Trump emerging stronger than ever.

The question isn't whether Democrats will continue their harassment campaign – of course they will. The question is: when will they finally realize that We the People are done with their games?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (9)

Leave a Comment

P
PatriotFirst2024Verified17 minutes ago
The Dems are absolutely delusional if they think comparing Clinton's testimony to getting Trump under oath is the same thing. Trump's legal team is way smarter than that.
C
ConservativeVoter88Verified17 minutes ago
Exactly! Plus Trump learned from watching how they treated Clinton back then.
S
SmallGovBigFreedomVerifiedjust now
This is just another fishing expedition. They've been trying to get Trump for years and keep coming up empty.
A
AmericaFirst1776Verifiedjust now
The double standard is unreal. They protect their own but go after Republicans with everything they've got. At least Trump fights back unlike the old GOP establishment.
R
RedStateRealistVerifiedjust now
I lived through the Clinton years and this is completely different. Clinton was actually president when most of his legal issues happened. The House Dems are grasping at straws here and everyone can see it.
C
ConstitutionDefenderVerifiedjust now
DELUSIONAL is right! 💯
R
RealAmericanMomVerifiedjust now
Why are they still obsessing over Trump when there are real issues affecting American families right now? Gas prices, inflation, border crisis - focus on that!
T
TruthSeeker2020Verifiedjust now
Can someone explain what specific depositions they're referring to? I remember Clinton testified but curious about the legal precedent they think they have.
L
LegalEagle45Verifiedjust now
They're probably talking about Clinton's Paula Jones deposition and maybe grand jury testimony. But those were very different circumstances legally speaking.